Bank Secrecy Act and Enforcement


  • ICBA opposes the mandatory collection of beneficial ownership information of legal entities regardless of risk by financial institutions. Rather, this information should be universally collected by FinCEN at the time an entity is formed. However, financial institutions should have access to this information to assist them in performing customer due diligence.
  • ICBA strongly recommends raising Currency Transaction Reporting (CTR) and Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) thresholds with future increases linked to inflation. The CTR threshold should be raised from $10,000 to $30,000.
  • ICBA supports Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) reforms that will ease compliance burdens while providing more useful data to law enforcement.
  • Nonbank institutions that perform “bank-like” functions and offer financial services should be subject to the same AML/BSA laws and regulations as banks.
  • ICBA encourages the Office of Foreign Asset Control to streamline and simplify watch-lists of terrorists for ease of reference and application by bankers.
  • ICBA asks that FinCEN take a leadership role in combatting ransomware, synthetic IDs, and other types of fraud.


Community bankers are committed to supporting balanced, effective measures to prevent terrorist financing and money laundering. However, because BSA/AML requirements are outdated, community banks doubt their effectiveness.

ICBA supports statutory and regulatory changes that would make BSA/AML requirement more targeted, efficient, and effective. Community banks should be relieved from the collection of beneficial ownership information, which is already collected at the time a legal entity is formed.

Today’s outdated SAR and CTR thresholds promote over-filing and dilute their value to law enforcement. Treasury is required by the 2020 Anti-Money Laundering Act to update these thresholds. Higher thresholds will result in more valuable information and reduce community bank burden. SARs will have more value if they are appropriately risk-based.

More generally, BSA requirements should be flexible, easily applied, and effectively communicated. Congress and the agencies should continue to work with industry to reduce community banks’ mounting costs and regulatory burdens. Additional guidance is needed that is understandable and easily applied. Community banks must understand the methods of terrorist financing and money laundering they are trying to prevent.

Finally, the federal government should have consistent regulations across all financial services providers including nonbank entities.

Staff Contact

Rhonda Thomas-Whitley

SVP and Senior Regulatory Counsel


[email protected]

Steven Estep

AVP, Operational Risk


[email protected]

Susan Sullivan

SVP, Congressional Relations


[email protected]

Be Heard

Direct grassroots advocacy is essential to promoting federal policies that support community banking – and ultimately impact your role at the bank. Our Be Heard grassroots action center offers a variety of tools to help you amplify your voice with targeted outreach to federal policymakers. 

Learn More

Virtual Advocacy Toolkit

Just like everything else, lobbying is a skill. This toolkit makes it easy to learn the best way to communicate with and engage policymakers in this virtual environment.  No matter what role you have at the bank, YOU can support community banks and make an impact.

Get Started

You are Invited to Capital Summit

Every year, community bankers are invited to attend the complementary ICBA Capital Summit and this year is easier than ever to participate. The event is fully virtual, April 27 at 11am-1pm Eastern Time, so mark your calendars!

Register Today

Related News

Task force updates AML-deficiency jurisdictions

March 11, 2022

The Financial Action Task Force—a global anti-money-laundering watchdog—updated its statements concerning jurisdictions with strategic AML, terrorist-financing, and weapons-proliferation deficiencies.

Updates: The FATF on March 4 removed Zimbabwe from its list of Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring and added the United Arab Emirates.

Unchanged: The FATF’s list of High-Risk Jurisdictions Subject to a Call for Action remains the same with Iran and North Korea still subject to FATF countermeasures.